1. What do people already know about my topic?
Everyone have ever seen the surrealism paintings
2. What research has already been done about my topic?
My argument would indicates how Hieronymus Bosch should be categorized. Since this problem have been debated for a long time and I would categorized him depending on his styles and intentions to draw, I think the standard to categorize painters would be reorganized by my argument.
-http://terms.naver.com/entry.nhn?docId=1116363 : Definition of Surrealism
-http://blog.naver.com/taschenbook/70188420681 : Hieronymus Bosch.Complete Works!
-http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hieronymus_Bosch , http://terms.naver.com/entry.nhn?docId=1102596 : History of Hieronymus Bosch
3. What are the implications of my argument (What if I'm right? What if I'm right and people ignore me?)
My argument would indicates how Hieronymus Bosch should be categorized. Since this problem have been debated for a long time and I would categorized him depending on his styles and intentions to draw, I think the standard to categorize painters would be reorganized by my argument.
My persuasive argument thesis is: Hieronymus Bosch should be categorized as an altarpiece painter.
Someone may have heard the name 'Hieronymus Bosch'. Also, someone would have seen surrealism interestingly. Therefore, before starting serious supports, I need to give you some information about my topic : Hieronymus Bosch and Surrealism. First Hieronymus Bosch is a Dutch artist who got ordered to draw altarpieces by new Kings because he was a sincere Christian. In his paintings, he depicted heaven and hell, Adam and Eve, and other utopian organisms. Still, his paintings has variety of opinions concerning the category. Second, Surrealism is a way to draw the world of fantasies and non-reality. Painters express their immediate thoughts and imagination through paintings without reason.
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기