1) What score do you think you deserve? Here is the rubric:
2 points - The first draft is thoughtful and a good start to an effective persuasive essay. It demonstrates an understanding of the classical argument.1 point - The student completes a first draft that demonstrates an understanding of the classical argument0 points - The first draft is inadequate
-I will give 1 point for me because it is short and the each of supporting's evidence lacks persuasion.
2) What did you do well?
-Since my argument is related with arts, I used some names of painting techniques. I think it makes readers prevent from understanding my argument so I additionally wrote the meanings by using relative pronoun. Moreover, I emphasize some points to remember.
-Since my argument is related with arts, I used some names of painting techniques. I think it makes readers prevent from understanding my argument so I additionally wrote the meanings by using relative pronoun. Moreover, I emphasize some points to remember.
arguments are based off of opinions and personal feelings.
3) What could you have done better?
3) What could you have done better?
-I wrote two first drafts. One is before the mid-term exam and the other is after the exam. I was pointed out that I arranged researches on my supporting argument. After accepting that point, I tried to write argument on my own words.
4) Which part of the classical argument did you use the best?
-It is refutation. I agreed some points of the opposite side and I refuted them by highlighting what I want to say and What point they have consider (Hieronymus Bosch is a Christ and not use the surrealism techniques.).
5) Which part of the classical argument did you use the most poorly?
-It is Narration. Although I suggested some definitions about my argument, it is not smooth. Also, when I wrote it, I didn't understand what Narration is and What I have to explain.
4) Which part of the classical argument did you use the best?
-It is refutation. I agreed some points of the opposite side and I refuted them by highlighting what I want to say and What point they have consider (Hieronymus Bosch is a Christ and not use the surrealism techniques.).
5) Which part of the classical argument did you use the most poorly?
-It is Narration. Although I suggested some definitions about my argument, it is not smooth. Also, when I wrote it, I didn't understand what Narration is and What I have to explain.
6) What's your strategy to make your second draft better?
-I would like to rewrite my narration briefly and to compensate my confirmation with powerful evidences.
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기